deployment adaptation results
Analogue correction as decision support
Background
Calibration vs analogue correction
Calibration
global shiftSame correction for all fields.
+β_tField A
+β_tField B
+β_tField C
+β_tQuery
Uses alllabeled target calibration fields estimate one shared bias shift.
Analogue correction
local analogue voteQuery-specific analogue correction.
w .52Top-1
w .31Top-2
w .17Top-3
local ΔQuery
Uses Top-3analogues are ranked by agro-feature distance; closer fields get larger weights.
Why scenes differ
Main result
label efficiency across crops and scenes
Modality evidence
Decision workflow
leakage-safe deploy-time evidenceBase model
Start from the Najjar-style multimodal Transformer prediction.
Target calibration
Estimate target-domain bias from a small labeled calibration bank.
Analogue retrieval
Find similar fields in target-domain agro-feature space.
LLM audit
Review LOO self-test, geometry, neighbour consistency, modality agreement, and historical prior.
Prefix-k rule
Trim distant neighbours or fall back when evidence is not reliable.
Recommendation
Apply analogue correction or keep calibration-only at deploy time.
Compact result table
mean ± std field-level RMSE| crop | protocol | SR | base MML | target-cal | DA q_agro | DA binary | best | TC - q_agro | TC - binary |
|---|